The Militia Act of 1792

We posed a provocative question in our previous post, where we asked whether President Eisenhower acted lawfully when he sent federal troops into Little Rock in the fall of 1957. Although the president is the “commander in chief” of the armed forces and has the power to enforce federal laws, at the same time Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress–not the president–the power “to raise and support armies” and “to provide for calling forth the militia.” (See image below.) Nevertheless, Congress delegated this “calling forth” power to the president early in our nation’s history, when Congress enacted the first Militia Act of 1792, available here. (Congress enacted a second Militia Act a few days later.) In particular, the first Militia Act law spells out three different procedures the president must follow to call forth a militia, depending on the type of emergency he is responding to:

  1. Invasion. When there is an invasion or an imminent threat of invasion, the president may act unilaterally to repel the invasion.
  2. Insurrection. When there is an internal insurrection within a state, the president’s authority to use military force is subject to a state veto of sorts. Specifically, the president must first request authorization from the state legislature or from the governor, if the legislature cannot be convened in time, before calling forth the militia.
  3. Execution of the laws of the union. In order to use military force to enforce federal law, the president must request a certification from an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court or from a federal district judge. Specifically, the associate justice or district judge must certify that the laws of the United States are being obstructed “by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.” In addition, the president must also receive authorization from Congress. If Congress is not in session, however, then the president’s authorization to use force automatically expires “thirty days after the commencement of the ensuing session.”

In addition, the 1792 law imposed a proclamation requirement on the president. That is, in any of these three situations, whether it be a foreign invasion, an internal insurrection, or an obstruction of federal law, the president was required to issue a formal proclamation before using force: “whenever it may be necessary, in the judgment of the President, to use the military force hereby directed to be called forth, the President shall forthwith, and previous thereto, by proclamation, command such insurgents to disperse, and retire peaceably to their respective abodes, within a limited time” (emphasis added).

Lastly, it’s also worth noting that the 1792 law contained a two-year sunset provision. Congress, however, reenacted the Militia Act on a permanent basis in 1795. Congress also took this opportunity to make several significant changes to the original law. We will thus review the 1795 replacement law in our next post.

Image result for calling forth the militia

Source: Michael McLaughlin

About F. E. Guerra-Pujol

When I’m not blogging, I am a business law professor at the University of Central Florida.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s