Our 2013 paper Gödel’s loophole considers two related questions: why have so few scholars taken Gödel’s alleged discovery seriously, and what was this possible logical contradiction in the Constitution? (Hint: it probably has to do something with recursion.) There is also some recent discussion of our thesis at Hacker News (Y Combinator) here. (Note: We will return to our review of “Bayesian reasoning in science” in our next post.)