Adam Smith’s hierarchy of legal rights/values: first life, then property, then promises

“To be deprived of that which we are possessed of, is a greater evil than to be disappointed of what we have only the expectation. Breach of property, therefore, theft and robbery, which take from us what we are possessed of, are greater crimes than breach of contract, which only disappoints us of what we expected. The most sacred laws of justice, therefore, those whose violation seems to call loudest for vengeance and punishment, are the laws which guard the life and person of our neighbour; the next are those which guard his property and possessions; and last of all come those which guard what are called his personal rights, or what is due to him from the promises of others.”

–Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Book 2, Sec. 2, Ch. 2, Para. 3

A Brief History of the Editions of TMS: Part 2 | Adam Smith Works
Unknown's avatar

About F. E. Guerra-Pujol

When I’m not blogging, I am a business law professor at the University of Central Florida.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Adam Smith’s hierarchy of legal rights/values: first life, then property, then promises

  1. Pingback: A possible connection between Adam Smith’s taxonomy of social groups and Thomas Schelling’s taxonomy of games | prior probability

Leave a comment