This fun question popped up in my WordPress dashboard the other day. My reply is below the fold:
“Neoliberal“
Because this empty epithet is not only meaningless; it is usually hurled by people, especially academics, who just want to make their lame ad hominem arguments sound sophisticated.
Welcome to the online home of the IASS
Philosophical thought from an amateur and armchair thinker. No expertise, just speculation.
In Conversation with Legal and Moral Philosophers
Relitigating Our Favorite Disputes
PhD, Jagiellonian University
Inquiry and opinion
Life is all about being curious, asking questions, and discovering your passion. And it can be fun!
Books, papers, and other jurisprudential things
Ramblings of a retiree in France
BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH
Natalia's space
hoping we know we're living the dream
Lover of math. Bad at drawing.
We hike, bike, and discover Central Florida and beyond
Making it big in business after age 40
Reasoning about reasoning, mathematically.
I don't mean to sound critical, but I am; so that's how it comes across
remember the good old days...
"Let me live, love and say it well in good sentences." - Sylvia Plath
a personal view of the theory of computation
Submitted For Your Perusal is a weblog wherein Matt Thomas shares and writes about things he thinks are interesting.
Logic at Columbia University
Just like the Thesis Whisperer - but with more money
the sky is no longer the limit
Technology, Culture, and Ethics
Just like the horse whisperer - but with more pages
Poetry, Other Words, and Cats
prior probability 
“Woke” — not that I defend the concept but because it was essentially turned into a slur, thanks mostly to DeSantis.
As a free speech absolutist, I believe that no words should be banned.
I think Neoliberal is one of those those words that is only an insult based on the context of usage.
I think most cases when someone is called “neoliberal” some see it as a milder synonym for “globalist”. Implying you are selling out to corporate interests.
I think the distinct depends whether you are attributing the title to a person or a set of policies. Typically when Reagan’s trade policy was described in textbooks (putting aside liberal bias) is being used more in the canonical sense of the original meaning of the word.
Much how context matters on how the “N-word” is used ( it can be an insult or a quasi-term of endearment depending on the speaker and their intentions), the same applies to the term “Neoliberal” Obviously, as far as slurs go, “Neoliberal” could never hold a candle to the “N-word” (considering the N-word is considered one of the most vile words in the English language).