Author Archives: F. E. Guerra-Pujol
David Hume’s devastating take-down of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau
Nota bene: this is the fifth of a series of blog posts on “the paradox of politics”; footnotes are below the fold. “In vain, are we asked in what records this charter of our liberties is registered.” –David Hume, Of … Continue reading
Sunday song: Goodbye Stranger
I will resume my series on the “paradox of politics” with David Hume in my next post. In the meantime, I am sharing the song “Goodbye Stranger” by the British rock band Supertramp. One of the ironies of this all-time … Continue reading
Life, liberty, and John Locke
Nota bene: this is the fourth of a series of blog posts on “the paradox of politics”; footnotes are below the fold. “… where there is no law there is no freedom.” –John Locke, Second Treatise (quoted in Strauss & … Continue reading
The ghost of Thomas Hobbes
Nota bene: this is the third of a series of blog posts on “the paradox of politics”; footnotes are below the fold. Is the paradox of politics, the central tension between law and liberty, soluble? Alas, the most popular solutions … Continue reading
The paradox of politics: prologue
The paradox is this: people rightfully value liberty, but what is the optimal amount? If we have too much freedom to pursue our private interests, some individuals may end up harming others, making social life unstable and intolerable. So, we … Continue reading
The paradox of politics
“The common understanding of politics, since the time of Hobbes and Locke, has taken the balancing of liberty and authority as the central issue.” (Strauss & Cropsey 1987, p. 717) Thomas S. Kuhn wrote about the “essential tension” between tradition … Continue reading
One last question for Klein, Swanson, and Young
Last week (see links below), I surveyed a new paper in Econ Journal Watch by Daniel Klein, Nicholas Swanson, and Jeffrey Young on Adam Smith’s impartial spectator. Today, I want to conclude this series of blog posts with a question … Continue reading
Further reply to KSY’s nine theses
In addition to the three Adam Smith quotes from TMS cited by Daniel Klein, Nicholas Swanson, and Jeffrey Young (KSY) in their new paper in Econ Journal Watch on the impartial spectator (see Klein et al. 2025, pp. 304-305; see … Continue reading

