Author Archives: F. E. Guerra-Pujol
Taxonomy of duties (review of XI.1)
We now proceed to Chapter XI of “Natural Law and Natural Rights.” This chapter is titled “Obligation” and contains nine subsections. Since I like to emphasize duties and responsibilities instead of rights, and since this is my favorite chapter of … Continue reading
Fairness versus accuracy (review of Chapter X)
We shall now review Chapter X of “Natural Law and Natural Rights.” Among other things, Professor Finnis explores the relation between law and coercion (pp. 260-264), identifies the main features of a legal order (pp. 266-270), and presents a “multi-faceted” … Continue reading
Authority, the nirvana fallacy, and the costs and benefits of co-ordination (review of IX)
We now proceed to Chapter IX of “Natural Law and Natural Rights.” This chapter contains five subsections and is devoted to the theme of authority. By “authority,” Professor Finnis means coercion or the power “to require one to choose what … Continue reading
Rainy day readings
My wife and I are in the Atlanta area this weekend, but the forecast calls for lots of rain. Perfect weather for reading! (We will return to “Natural Law and Natural Rights” on Monday.)
Critique of rights-talk: three key points
Before we wrap up our review of “Natural Law and Natural Rights” (NLNR), I want to take a moment to sum up my protracted two-part Coasean critique of rights-talk (here is part one and here is part two) by making … Continue reading
A Coasean critique of rights-talk, part 2
In response to Professor Finnis’s analysis of rights in Chapter VIII of his book on “Natural Law and Natural Rights,” we began to present a general critique of rights-talk in our previous post. Specifically, we surveyed Ronald Coase’s economic analysis … Continue reading
A Coasean critique of rights-talk (review of Chapter VIII, part 1)
We now proceed to Chapter VIII of “Natural Law and Natural Rights.” Among other things, Professor Finnis revisits W. N. Hohfeld’s classic taxonomy of rights (see pp. 199-205), delves into the history of the language of rights (pp. 206-210), and … Continue reading
Finnis versus Nozick (partial review of Chapter VII)
We now proceed to Chapter VII of “Natural law and natural rights,” the chapter on justice. Alas, Professor Finnis’s beautiful theory of justice is built on theoretical quicksand, for it is premised on his view of the common good, and … Continue reading
Good common goods and bad common goods (review of Chapter VI)
Note: This part of our review of “Natural law and natural rights” (NLNR) was revised on 17 May 2019. (In fairness to Finnis we added an important clarification below the cartoon.) We now proceed to Chapter VI of NLNR, though, … Continue reading
The morality of choice (review of Chapter V, or exercises in mental masturbation)
Let’s now turn to Chapter V of “Natural law and natural rights,” the most important chapter in Professor Finnis’s beautiful book. This chapter is a must-read because Professor Finnis does three big things in this chapter: (1) he presents a … Continue reading

