Category Archives: Uncategorized

A Bayesian approach to the trolley problem? (mini-thought experiment)

Note: This is a follow-up to our Nov. 14 post titled “A Bayesian defense of the Hadley rule.” In our 2014 paper Trolley Problems, we wrote (footnotes omitted): “Consider the [standard] version of the trolley problem [pictured below]. There are … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Elemental scarcity

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Is there nothing outside the text? (A plea for textualists)

Because of our lifelong fascination with classical legal and religious texts like the Twelve Tables of ancient times and the Ten Commandments of biblical times–and with the rules and methods of interpretation of such texts–, we stumbled upon Steven D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Bayesian updating (forest cover edition)

Florida has more forest cover than Colorado! (For an explanation, check out this thread on Reddit; hat tip: danyellan.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Private sector justice

According to various reports (just google the words “Jameis” and “Uber”), the ride-sharing firm Uber listened to its driver and banned NFL quarterback and accused rapist Jameis Winston from using their service. The driver, however, did not file a police … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Leading cause of death world map

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Making American Cars Great Again!

0 to 100 km/h in 1.9 sec pic.twitter.com/xTOTDGuwQj — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 17, 2017

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Antebellum map

Hat tip: GScottCork, via Reddit

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bayesian updating or Whig history? (Matt Yglesias edition)

Bill Clinton should have resigned. (Updated Nov 19: a milder example of whiggism.) Below the fold, #Irony …

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Winner’s curse?

Check out this excellent essay by art critic Jerry Saltz, via Vulture. According to Mr Saltz, the newly-discovered Leonardo da Vinci painting (pictured below), which was sold for over $450 million, is most likely a sham.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments