Check out this new paper by Saul Smilansky, who turns the tables on Pascal’s Wager (see also here and image below). In brief, Professor Smilansky’s argument is that God will be more upset at people who accept the wager (i.e. belief in God) but still commit moral transgressions than at atheists who reject the wager but live good moral lives. Although I am not buying Smilansky’s argument (since we are all sinners), it is worth reading and thinking about. Hat tip: Brian Leiter.
That is the title of this 2001 paper by mathematician W. D. Kaigh, who revisits the “Arizona Pick 3 incident” in which a flawed random digit generator severely compromised the Arizona Lottery Pick 3 in the summer of 1998. (I discovered Kaigh’s intriguing paper when I was reading Stephen Stigler’s new book “Casanova’s Lottery.”) On a related note, check out this excellent essay by Kathryn Schulz, who surveys the history, politics, and economics of State lotteries. Schulz’s work was published in the latest issue of The New Yorker.
I recently discovered in my WordPress feed a legal philosophy blog edited by Lucas Miotto and Martin David Kelly. Their excellent blog, which is called “Legal-Phi”, contains in-depth interviews with many young legal and moral philosophers. Today, I am re-blogging their most recent interview: Ezequiel Monti (see below). Among other things, Professor Monti explains his take on Mark Greenberg’s influential “Moral Impact Theory of Law.” What role, for example, do “moral facts” play in law? How is a legal obligation similar to or different from a moral obligation? These are fascinating questions, but I won’t go into the technical details of Greenberg’s theory (or Monti’s take on that theory), except to point out an important omission that bedevils this never-ending legal-philosophical debate: the problem of “immoral promises” (see here, for instance). To borrow Professor Monti’s own example, “Suppose I promise you to wash your car. In virtue of my promise, I now have an obligation to wash your car.” Now consider a different example: A promises B to steal C’s car. Doesn’t A now have an obligation to steal C’s car? If not, why not? (Please, no answers with circular reasoning in them.)
It is a pleasure to have Ezequiel Monti as our third interviewee of 2022. Ezequiel obtained his PhD in Legal Philosophy at King’s College London in 2019. He is currently an Assistant Professor at Torcuato Di Tella University, School of Lawand a María Zambrano Fellow at Pompeu Fabra University. Ezequiel works primarily on topics within general jurisprudence, in particular questions about legal obligations, authority, and the grounds of legal facts.
I’m not sure what my real motivation to study law was. The story I tell myself about the reasons underlying my decision has changed over time. My current guess is that it was kind of a compromise with my parents. After finishing high school, I was mostly interested in literature and films, and I flirted with the idea of…
View original post 8,050 more words
Chess prodigy Hans Niemann (pictured below, right) has just sued grandmaster Magnus Carlsen in Missouri for defamation. Here is a copy of the 44-page complaint, and here is the first paragraph: “Niemann is a 19-year-old, self-taught chess prodigy. He brings this action to recover from the devastating damages that [Magnus Carlsen and others] have inflicted upon his reputation, career, and life by egregiously defaming him and unlawfully colluding to blacklist him from the profession to which he has dedicated his life.” Crazy, right? (Hat tip: Eugene Volokh.)
My take: Truth is a complete defense to a claim of defamation, so we might find out once and for all whether Niemann was cheating when he defeated Magnus in chess earlier this year.
On this day (20 October) in 1803, the United States Senate ratified the Louisiana Purchase treaty by a vote of 24 to 7. (More details here, via Wikipedia.)
On this day (July 4) in 1803, the terms of the treaty between the United States and France for the purchase and sale of Louisiana — the Vente de la Louisiane or “Louisiana Purchase“, a treaty that quite possibly changed the course of world history — are announced to the public: $15 million for 828,000 square miles west of the Mississippi River.
Put another way, now that the Twitter deal is apparently back on (see here, for example), is Elon Musk about to make the biggest and costliest mistake of his storied business career? According to this Hudson Institute report, Twitter’s total revenues for 2021 were roughly $5 billion, but at the same time Twitter’s estimated “enterprise value” is $36.51 billion. (See also this May 2022 report via Forbes.)
Below are the L.A. Lakers’ stats from last night’s NBA season opener against the Golden State Warriors. I readily concede that this is a small sample size (one game), but combined with last year’s statistics, maybe it’s Anthony Davis–and not Russell Westbrook–who should be traded? (At the very least, Westbrook is less injury-prone and thus a more reliable overall athlete than AD.) Change my mind!
According to this recent report (hat tip: Drudge), Birds Aren’t Real is a “parody movement” that claims all birds in the US have been replaced by lookalike drones, which are used by the government to spy on citizens. Most (some?) members of this group, however, admit they do not truly believe in this far-fetched conspiracy. Either way, check out this website (https://birdsarentreal.com), which sells “Birds Aren’t Real” merchandise.
Pictured below is a satellite map of this South American city:
One of my favorite reggeaton songs of all time!
On another note (sorry!), today (17 October 2022) is Ziggy Marley 54th birthday.
Welcome to the online home of the IASS
Hopefully It’s Interesting.
In Conversation with Legal and Moral Philosophers
PhD, Jagiellonian University
Books, papers, and other jurisprudential things
Ramblings of a retiree in France
BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH
Natalia's space
hoping we know we're living the dream
Lover of math. Bad at drawing.
We hike, bike, and discover Central Florida and beyond
Making it big in business after age 40
Reasoning about reasoning, mathematically.
I don't mean to sound critical, but I am; so that's how it comes across
remember the good old days...
"Let me live, love and say it well in good sentences." - Sylvia Plath
a personal view of the theory of computation
Logic at Columbia University
Just like the Thesis Whisperer - but with more money
the sky is no longer the limit
Technology, Culture, and Ethics
Just like the horse whisperer - but with more pages
Poetry, Other Words, and Cats
