Say what? That is from Austin Kleon’s talk titled “How to keep going” (published in Medium). Read the whole thing here.

Hat tip: Kottke
Say what? That is from Austin Kleon’s talk titled “How to keep going” (published in Medium). Read the whole thing here.

Hat tip: Kottke
We identified several types of legal risk in our previous post, including the risk of litigation, the risk of legal liability (both civil and criminal), and the risk of reputation loss, but what can a business firm do to mitigate or reduce such risks? There are three possible solutions: contracts, insurance, and internal controls. Let’s examine each risk-reduction method below:
One last point. These risk management solutions are not mutually exclusive. In fact, a risk averse firm will employ all three methods to various degrees, depending on the probability and severity of the legal risks it faces.

Image Credit: Connor James
Why teach business law to undergraduates? One reason (perhaps the reason) is to make them aware of the basic concept of “legal risk.” Business firms of all shapes and sizes confront a wide variety of legal risks every day. If these risks were to occur, they could cost the firm a lot of money and a loss of goodwill. Here are three major legal risks every firm (and person) must deal with:
1. Risk of Litigation. A firm could be sued–by the government, by its customers, by its employees (or former employees), by its contract partners, by its owners, and even by third parties who were injured by the firm’s products. Defending a lawsuit (or initiating one) costs time and money, and the outcome of a case will always involve some level of uncertainty.
2. Risk of Legal Liability. There is not only a risk that a firm could be sued; there is also a risk that a court or regulatory agency could impose civil or criminal liability on the firm if the firm has breached any legal duties or broken any laws. The most common examples of civil liability are torts and breaches of contract. Examples of corporate criminal liability include such misconduct as bribery, fraud, and tax evasion. As a result, sometimes firms prefer to settle out of court than take their chances at trial.
3. Risk of Reputation Loss. Regardless of the outcome of any business litigation, a firm’s reputation could suffer if it is accused of legal or ethical misconduct or is otherwise involved in litigation, either as a plaintiff or a defendant. Just ask Mark Zuckerberg!

credit: salmanoup
The great John Paul Stevens, a retired judge who served on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1975 to 2010, says yes. Here is his provocative op-ed (NY Times). In the alternative, why not let each State decide this matter? (See, for example, the wording of the 21st Amendment.)


hat tip: @pickover
Check out this map of literal translations for the names of European countries. More details here and here. (Hat tip: kottke.)
More details here, via Rhett Jones (Gizmodo).
Hopefully It’s Interesting.
In Conversation with Legal and Moral Philosophers
PhD, Jagiellonian University
Books, papers, and other jurisprudential things
Ramblings of a retiree in France
BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH
Natalia's space
hoping we know we're living the dream
Lover of math. Bad at drawing.
We hike, bike, and discover Central Florida and beyond
Making it big in business after age 40
Reasoning about reasoning, mathematically.
I don't mean to sound critical, but I am; so that's how it comes across
remember the good old days...
"Let me live, love and say it well in good sentences." - Sylvia Plath
a personal view of the theory of computation
Submitted For Your Perusal is a weblog wherein Matt Thomas shares and writes about things he thinks are interesting.
Logic at Columbia University
Just like the Thesis Whisperer - but with more money
the sky is no longer the limit
Technology, Culture, and Ethics
Just like the horse whisperer - but with more pages
Poetry, Other Words, and Cats