Welcome to the online home of the IASS
Philosophical thought from an amateur and armchair thinker. No expertise, just speculation.
In Conversation with Legal and Moral Philosophers
Relitigating Our Favorite Disputes
PhD, Jagiellonian University
Inquiry and opinion
Life is all about being curious, asking questions, and discovering your passion. And it can be fun!
Books, papers, and other jurisprudential things
Ramblings of a retiree in France
BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH
Natalia's space
hoping we know we're living the dream
Lover of math. Bad at drawing.
We hike, bike, and discover Central Florida and beyond
Making it big in business after age 40
Reasoning about reasoning, mathematically.
I don't mean to sound critical, but I am; so that's how it comes across
remember the good old days...
"Let me live, love and say it well in good sentences." - Sylvia Plath
a personal view of the theory of computation
Submitted For Your Perusal is a weblog wherein Matt Thomas shares and writes about things he thinks are interesting.
Logic at Columbia University
Just like the Thesis Whisperer - but with more money
the sky is no longer the limit
Technology, Culture, and Ethics
Just like the horse whisperer - but with more pages
Poetry, Other Words, and Cats
prior probability 
Well, you just used this as an argument against me, so, you know: bias. But I still think I should say this: the reason this might be true is that if you say a lot of things or more bold things than boring, you increase the odds of being interesting on occasion. But one of the ways of being really interesting is being spectacularly wrong. Just saying.
Agreed: the more bold, daring, and interesting one’s statements are, the more likely one is to be wrong (is this, however, a linear relationship, or an exponential one?). But at the same, the less likely one is willing to be wrong, the less likely one is to make a great discovery or propose a new idea.