Extra credit. Do you have any ideas or topics for future posts? Share them with prior probability in the comments section below.
Extra credit. Do you have any ideas or topics for future posts? Share them with prior probability in the comments section below.
Welcome to the online home of the IASS
Philosophical thought from an amateur and armchair thinker. No expertise, just speculation.
In Conversation with Legal and Moral Philosophers
Relitigating Our Favorite Disputes
PhD, Jagiellonian University
Inquiry and opinion
Life is all about being curious, asking questions, and discovering your passion. And it can be fun!
Books, papers, and other jurisprudential things
Ramblings of a retiree in France
BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH
Natalia's space
hoping we know we're living the dream
Lover of math. Bad at drawing.
We hike, bike, and discover Central Florida and beyond
Making it big in business after age 40
Reasoning about reasoning, mathematically.
I don't mean to sound critical, but I am; so that's how it comes across
remember the good old days...
"Let me live, love and say it well in good sentences." - Sylvia Plath
a personal view of the theory of computation
Submitted For Your Perusal is a weblog wherein Matt Thomas shares and writes about things he thinks are interesting.
Logic at Columbia University
Just like the Thesis Whisperer - but with more money
the sky is no longer the limit
Technology, Culture, and Ethics
Just like the horse whisperer - but with more pages
Poetry, Other Words, and Cats
I’m working on my upper level writing requirement and came across an article about the mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food and constitutionally, we do not have a right to know.
Sally Noxon Vecchiarelli, Mandatory Labeling Of Genetically Engineered Food: Constitutionally, You Do Not Have A Right To Know, 22 S.J. AGRIC. L. REV. 215 (2013)
There’s the citation if you want to check it out. Seems interesting to me that, while there have been no reports of any human harm…so why not label if it is deemed generally safe?
This might seem silly given the history of events thus far, but eventually I believe we’ll be running into the problem of who can do what on Earth’s moon. So far, no manned presence there has been achieved any others besides the U.S., and there have never been any kinds if commercial enterprises there. I’d be interested to see which courts could even hear a case about conduct or property rights off planet, let alone what these disputes might be.
A few ideas for future topics:
-Cyber bullying and the First Amendment
-Welfare drug testing and the Fourth Amendment
-Can illegal immigrants practice law?
-California paparazzi law; do celebrities have a right to privacy?