Should we repeal the Infield Fly Rule?

Believe it or not, the infield fly rule in baseball has generated extensive scholarly commentary over the years, beginning with William S. Stevens’ 1975 paper “The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule.” The most recent contributions to this literature are Andrew J. Guilford and Joel Mallord’s ten-page paper “Time to Drop the Infield Fly Rule and End a Common Law Anomaly” as well as Howard M. Wasserman’s nine-page reply “Perverse Incentives, Cost-Benefit Imbalances, and the Infield Fly Rule.” Both papers are short by law review standards but replete with footnotes. Guilford and Mallord’s paper, for example, has no less than 48 footnotes, while Wasserman’s paper has ‘just’ 33 footnotes. By comparison, in case you’re wondering, Stevens’ classic paper on the infield fly rule consists of eight pages and 48 footnotes. So, if you want to read about the infield fly rule in baseball, expect to wade through about 4.7 footnotes per page on average. (Hat tip: Steven Lubet, via The Faculty Lounge.)

Screen Shot 2016-03-25 at 6.15.16 PM

Source: H. Wasserman, “An Empirical Analysis of the Infield Fly Rule,” Journal of Law, Vol. 4, No. 2 (2014), p. 136.

About F. E. Guerra-Pujol

When I’m not blogging, I am a business law professor at the University of Central Florida.
This entry was posted in Law, Rules, Sports. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s