If “did not vote” were a candidate, it would have won the 2016 election

Posted on November 19, 2016 by F. E. Guerra-Pujol

Credit: Taillesskangaru, via reddit.

About F. E. Guerra-Pujol

When I’m not blogging, I am a business law professor at the University of Central Florida.
This entry was posted in Bayesian Reasoning, Current Affairs. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to If “did not vote” were a candidate, it would have won the 2016 election

  1. Craig says:
    November 19, 2016 at 00:33

    I have a GREAT idea, which I am sharing here on your blog, Enrique. In my 27th Amendment, registered voters who do not vote for President will be considered to have voted for the INCUMBENT (because those voters apparently don’t care to change things) so if 51% of the registered voters don’t vote, then the INCUMBENT stays in office for two more years! That would provide some incentive for showing up at the polls.

    Reply
  2. Craig says:
    November 19, 2016 at 00:34

    Oops. I mean 28th Amendment. Lost count.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s