A friendly critique of Moral Machines

We’ve been reading Wendell Wallach and Colin Allen’s fascinating book “Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong,” a book we discovered last month at a conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Law held at Savannah Law School. (Dr Wallach was the keynote speaker.) Although their book was published in 2010, the recent spat between Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg over the future of AI makes “Moral Machines” a timely read, since Wallach and Allen offer a comprehensive overview of many issues relevant to “machine morality.”

Nevertheless, the premise of their book is off base. Why? Because even if we could teach or program machines to be ethical, so what? Ethics does not provide a sufficient safeguard against evil. In fact, I would go as far as to argue that it is a complete waste of time to program ethics into machines. Which theory of ethics would we choose from? There are so many competing theories of right and wrong, that any ingenious person or machine could justify just about any decision on moral grounds. By the same token, I am not sanguine about the prospects of “crowdsourcing” morality, since the crowd could be wrong on moral matters. Instead of machine morality, perhaps we should focus on machine mortality: we could require all advanced machines or strong AI to self-destruct after some period of time.

In the alternative, we would spend less time thinking about ethics and more time inventing new systems of effective checks and balances: machines that monitor and counter other machines! That is, instead of trying to teach ethics to future machines (as Wallach & Colin propose), or instead of “crowdsourcing” morality (as others have proposed), why not look at this problem in game theory or strategic terms? Consider the domains of markets or politics. Without competition (i.e. open markets with free exit and entry) or some formal system of checks and balances (such as the constitutional one depicted in the image below), no amount of ethics or morality will save us from ourselves. Why doesn’t this same logic apply to AI?

About F. E. Guerra-Pujol

When I’m not blogging, I am a business law professor at the University of Central Florida.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to A friendly critique of Moral Machines

  1. Pingback: Machine morality | prior probability

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s