Frank Valdes on the craft of scholarly writing

Our friend and colleague Frank Valdes (University of Miami) also attended the first annual Margaret Montoya Legal Scholarship Retreat. He shared his thoughts on the craft of scholarly writing during the retreat. Here are a few things that we learned from Professor Valdes:

  1. There are puzzles, and then are Puzzles. Most scholarship is problem-solving. Some problems consist of puzzles (small p), problems that we have already solved in our minds. Our solution might be a tentative one, or it might be fully-developed. In either case, the purpose of our scholarly writing is to share our pre-arranged solutions with our readers. Other problems, by contrast, consist of Puzzles (capital P), problems we have no idea how to solve ahead of time. In these cases, writing is a form of discovery.
  2. Cultivate your scholarly garden every single day. There is no algorithm for deciding what problems or puzzles/Puzzles are worth working on, but you must work on your problems every single day. This work might consist of studying the existing literature on one of your problems. Or it might consist of writing a paragraph or an entire page about some aspect of one of your problems. Or it might consist of editing a passage or page you have already written. Whatever the case, there are no short cuts. One must allocate sufficient time each day to one’s scholarly projects and problems. (This will be the time when you close your door, shut off your email, and just work.)
  3. It doesn’t have to be perfect; it just has to be done. When do you know a particular project of yours is done? Ideally, it’s when you feel you have said something original or novel about the problem you are working on …
Image result for kuhn puzzle solving

<<Under normal conditions the [legal scholar] is not an innovator but a solver of puzzles, and the puzzles upon which he concentrates are just those [that] he believes can be both stated and solved with the existing [legal] tradition.>>

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Frank Valdes on the craft of scholarly writing

  1. Pingback: Tayyab Mahmud on the politics of scholarship | prior probability

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s