In addition to the six philosophical “houses” pictured below, we recently posted this fun example (involving literary figures) of conflict-prone groups.
hat tip: @Philosophymeme0
Creative Commons
Blogs I Follow
In addition to the six philosophical “houses” pictured below, we recently posted this fun example (involving literary figures) of conflict-prone groups.
hat tip: @Philosophymeme0
Welcome to the online home of the IASS
Philosophical thought from an amateur and armchair thinker. No expertise, just speculation.
In Conversation with Legal and Moral Philosophers
Relitigating Our Favorite Disputes
PhD, Jagiellonian University
Inquiry and opinion
Life is all about being curious, asking questions, and discovering your passion. And it can be fun!
Books, papers, and other jurisprudential things
Ramblings of a retiree in France
BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH
Natalia's space
hoping we know we're living the dream
Lover of math. Bad at drawing.
We hike, bike, and discover Central Florida and beyond
Making it big in business after age 40
Reasoning about reasoning, mathematically.
I don't mean to sound critical, but I am; so that's how it comes across
remember the good old days...
"Let me live, love and say it well in good sentences." - Sylvia Plath
a personal view of the theory of computation
Submitted For Your Perusal is a weblog wherein Matt Thomas shares and writes about things he thinks are interesting.
Logic at Columbia University
Just like the Thesis Whisperer - but with more money
the sky is no longer the limit
Technology, Culture, and Ethics
Just like the horse whisperer - but with more pages
Poetry, Other Words, and Cats
prior probability 
House six. Seeing Dan Dennett and Kant go at it would be fun.
Too bad there wasn’t any overlap between Hume and Kant. That would be another good match up. Another good one would be Ayn Rand and Kant. Considering her distain for Kant.
Marx and Nozick would also be a real blast!
How did I forget that one? I’ll add that one to the list!