David Hume vs. Adam Smith

Before we discuss the main features of Adam Smith’s approach to moral philosophy (sympathy or fellow-feeling, the imaginary impartial spectator, and virtue), I want to share with you two quotes by David Hume: one about the limited role of reason in matters of morality; the other on Hume’s famous “is-ought” distinction, i.e. the notion that facts and values are two different domains. In many ways, Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments can be seen as an extended reply to Hume. (An in-depth survey of Hume’s moral philosophy can be found here.)

About F. E. Guerra-Pujol

When I’m not blogging, I am a business law professor at the University of Central Florida.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to David Hume vs. Adam Smith

  1. As a side-bar note: I have always personally preferred David Hume to Adam Smith. As unpopular as that may be. I stand by this outlier opinion. When it came to economics both were very similar, heavily influenced by Richard Cantillon (among other french physiocrats). I found Hume to be a better writer.

    • I agree

      Hume > Smith

      but in fairness to Smith, hardly anyone ever reads “the theory of moral sentiments” (confession: I finally cracked this book open for the first time last summer, and the more I read about it and study it for myself, the more respect I have for Smith and the more upset I become at the was Smith has been caricatured by many scholars and the public at large)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s