Criminal data fraud

Alternative title: Man bites dog!

Why isn’t data fraud a crime? In a working paper I wrote in 2019, I proposed charging researchers who fabricate data with wire fraud. Here is an excerpt from my 2019 paper (edited by me for clarity):

The literature on data fraud and data fabrication views these bad practices through a purely ethical lens …. This paper, by contrast, will explore the possibility of criminal sanctions against academic researchers who fabricate data. My previous work in this domain (Guerra-Pujol, 2017 [available here, by the way]) explored the possibility of imposing various forms of tort and contract liability for data fraud committed by academic researchers. Building on my previous work, I will explore the possibility of criminal liability when a researcher knowingly fabricates research data in a published paper. In a word, the fabrication of data–the attempt to publish fake data, to be more precise–should be treated as a crime * * * * for it is beyond question that the outright fabrication of data … not only calls into question the integrity of academic accounting; a strong case can also be made that fraudulent research constitutes the crime of wire fraud.

Fast forward to 2021 and this report by Scott Jaschik: “Ex-Dean at Temple Indicted on Charges of Manipulating Rankings.” (Hat tip: Brian Leiter.) In brief, federal prosecutors have charged Moshe Porat (pictured below), the former dean of Temple University’s business school (from 1996 to 2018), with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of wire fraud for submitting fake data to U.S. News & World Report about Temple business school’s online MBA and part-time MBA programs in order to inflate his school’s rankings in the annual U.S. News surveys. (Here is some additional background about this remarkable case, and here is the official announcement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. If convicted, this disgraced former dean faces up to 25 years in prison and a $500,000 fine.)

Given the problem of fabricated data in science (see, for example, RetractionWatch), who will be next?

Poets&Quants | Former B-School Dean Indicted On Fraud Charges In MBA  Rankings Scandal
Oh, how the mighty have fallen!

About F. E. Guerra-Pujol

When I’m not blogging, I am a business law professor at the University of Central Florida.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Criminal data fraud

  1. Reblogged this on prior probability and commented:

    Three updates re: wire fraud charges against former-Temple Dean (see my post below):
    1. My colleague and friend Orin S. Kerr has posted this thread on Twitter asking the following question, What exactly is criminal, if anything, about submitting fake data to US News?
    2. Professor Kerr’s friend Micheal Levy, a federal prosecutor, has also commented on this wire fraud case here.
    3. I will be responding to both Kerr and Levy in the days ahead.

  2. Pingback: Calling bullshit? (wire fraud edition) | prior probability

  3. Pingback: A deeper dive into the law of wire fraud | prior probability

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s