The Most Senile Justice?

That is the title of my 2007 paper on judicial senility, which I am showcasing today as part of my “Throwback Thursday” series in which I feature my most “vintage” scholarly works. As an aside, my four-page paper on “Senile Justices” is one of only two “empirical” papers that I have ever written. (I will revisit my other empirical paper in a future post. My other works are either theoretical or historical in nature.)

In summary, inspired by the work of historian David Garrow, my paper attempts to measure the true extent of the problem of judicial decrepitude among the members of the Supreme Court of the United States since the court’s inception in 1789. After collecting and presenting the relevant data, I conclude (contra Garrow) that the incidence of judicial decrepitude is relatively infrequent and rare.

About F. E. Guerra-Pujol

When I’m not blogging, I am a business law professor at the University of Central Florida.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to The Most Senile Justice?

  1. I will read this paper soon!

    Then report back.

  2. So overall the news isn’t all bad. It looks like on average the Justices spend most of their time on the bench as cognitively lucid.

    I am disappointed to find out Holmes was cognitively lucid when ruled on Buck V. Bell.

Leave a Reply to F. E. Guerra-Pujol Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s