Legally speaking, who should have the property right to the baseball in the film clip below: (A) the lady who was standing right in front of the ball and was just about to grab it, or (B) the man who ran across an entire row of seats and grabbed the ball the first? Most people have been siding with the dad, but when I first saw the video I thought the woman was right to be upset because the ball was heading right toward her. I therefore think it’s totally unfair to call her the “Philly Karen,” let alone try to get her fired from her job. P.S.: I have blogged about the case of Pierson v. Post before (see here).