Author Archives: F. E. Guerra-Pujol

Unknown's avatar

About F. E. Guerra-Pujol

When I’m not blogging, I am a business law professor at the University of Central Florida.

Notes on Erie v. Tompkins

Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, decided in 1938, is required reading in every U.S. law school. In Erie, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that the federal courts do not have the judicial power to create “general federal common law” when … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Geographical distribution of Spanish-speaking populations

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The old man and the Bayesian sea

That is the title of our most recent work in progress, available here via SSRN, and here is the abstract: “The Old Man and the Sea is a timeless classic. One of Ernest Hemingway’s most famous works, it tells the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Happy Lighthouse Day!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A modest proposal (Twitter edition)

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Hiding in plain sight

Could the number of followers a candidate has on Twitter provide a better prediction of the outcome of an election than traditional polls?

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The answer is NO!

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Conclusion of ASU

It’s time to conclude our review of Chapter 10, the last chapter of Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Nozick closes this chapter by restating his original vision of the dual nature of his conception of utopia (p. 332): “There is the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Paging Professor Nozick: C’mon man!

Thus far, we have reviewed the first eight (of eleven) subsections of Chapter 10 of ASU. Here, we review the ninth subsection (pp. 326-331), where Nozick finally gets around to addressing the elephant in the utopian room: who will resolve … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Some problems with the utopian framework

Nozick spots several problems with his utopian framework in the middle sections of Chapter 10 of ASU (pp. 320-325). One problem is theoretical: his framework for utopia appears to be internally inconsistent. On the one hand, the overall framework is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment