Prologue: Adam Smith in Geneva

Why did Adam Smith go out of his way to travel to the little Swiss city-state of Geneva in the fall of 1765? At the time, Geneva was an independent and self-governing republic, but she was much smaller than now, covering an area of 124 square kilometers. [See, e.g., Phillip Judd, “On this day 200 years ago Geneva nearly doubled in size“, Le News (3 March 2016). As an aside, Geneva did not officially join the Swiss Confederation until 19 May 1815 (ibid.).] As it happens, my colleague, friend, and co-author Alain Alcouffe and I have been researching this very question for many months now.

In summary, our point of departure is Chapter 13 of John Rae’s Life of Adam Smith, which recounts many of the most salient events and encounters during the middle phase of Smith’s Grand Tour years–specifically, the time Smith spent in the Republic of Geneva beginning in October 1765. (As an aside, Rae incorrectly has Smith departing Geneva as early as December 1765, but as my colleague Alain Alcouffe and I have discovered, this is wrong, for Smith’s sojourn in Geneva most likely lasted until the end of January or beginning of February 1766.) In brief, Rae and subsequent biographers rightly emphasize Smith’s encounters with his intellectual hero, the famed Voltaire, especially given the stature of this famed Enlightenment figure as well as their mutual interest in l’affaire Calas, a major legal and religious controversy that played out in Toulouse, where Smith had spent most of 1764 and 1765.

But at the same time, it is also worth pointing out that Smith met, befriended, and exchanged ideas with many other notable historical figures and intellectuals during his stay in Switzerland, including, in alphabetical order, (1) the botanist Charles Bonnet, who by all accounts abhored Smith’s intellectual mentor David Hume; (2) the wealthy and beautiful widow Louise Elisabeth de La Rochefoucauld (duchesse d’Enville), described as Turgot’s “muse” by some of our primary sources; (3) the physicist Georges-Louis Le Sage, who invented the electric telegraph; (4) the hospitable Lord and Lady Stanhope, who hosted many dinner parties for British visitors during their residency in Geneva; and (5) one of the most famous medical doctors of the Enlightenment era, Theodore Tronchin (pictured below), whose son had recently attended Smith’s foundational philosophy lectures at the University of Glasgow.

Prior to his sojourn in Switzerland, however, Smith did not know any of these Lumières; accordingly, Alain Alcouffe and I will explain in our next post why the “City of Calvin” or “Protestant Rome” was such a popular destination for 18th century British aristocrats on their grand tours of Europe.

File:Théodore Tronchin (1709-1781), médecin genevois, professeur à l'Académie.jpg
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Wikipedia Wednesday: Marie Louise Nicole de La Rochefoucauld, duchesse d’Enville

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Louise_Nicole_de_La_Rochefoucauld (in French)

L’hôtel de La Rochefoucauld, vue par l’arrière depuis la rue des Augustins, sur le plan dit de Turgot (1739).
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Tuesdays with TCAT (Tyler Cowen & Alex Tabarrok)

For me, Tyler Cowen and Alex Tabarrok are the original “blog kings” — I have been a huge fan of their “Marginal Revolution” blog since 2006 — so why not share the love every Tuesday by featuring my favorite Cowen/Tabarrok posts from the previous week?

Cowen, 21 Nov — Bike lanes are not about bikes: https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2024/11/bike-lanes-are-not-about-bikes.html

Tabarrok, 22 Nov — Sunstein on DOGE: https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2024/11/sunstein-on-doge.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This day in legal history: Treaty of Granada

What if southern Spain were still an Islamic emirate? On this day (25 November) in 1491, the Treaty of Granada was signed and ratified by Boabdil, the last sultan of the Emirate of Granada, and Ferdinand and Isabella, the King and Queen of Castile, León, Aragon, and Sicily, who completed the “Reconquist of Spain”. (Here is an English-language translation of the treaty.) Among other things, this treaty decreed a truce between the warring parties, followed by the relinquishment in January 1492 of the sovereignty of the Muslim Emirate of Granada (founded in the 13th century) to the Catholic monarchs of Spain.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sunday songs: *Tell me* and *Every second*

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Will Trump finally release the remaining JFK assassination files?

Or will Biden? See here: https://manifold.markets/BusinessLawProf/will-president-biden-release-by-dec

In the meantime, it is worth noting that we were lied to about this the last time around (see here), but fwiw check out this report, via Forbes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What happened to the political Left’s *court expansion* plans?

Oh, the irony! The self-described “progressive constitutionalist” Harvard law professor Mark Tushnet published his latest paper on court reform (without, alas, any sense of irony) the day after the re-election of Donald J. Trump!

Democrats' Plan To Expand Supreme Court Has Bleak Future : NPR
File under: “I call bullshit“! (Photo credit: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Francesca Gino data fraud update

Gino is the Harvard Business School professor accused of using fake data in her papers, including at least one purporting to show how to elicit honest behavior (see here, for example)! Earlier this week, Daniel Engber, a senior editor at The Atlantic, published this damning report explaining why the research fraud problem in the trendy field of behavioral psychology is much bigger than Gino. Below is an excerpt:

More than a year since all of this began [i.e. the original allegations of research fraud committed by Gino], the evidence of fraud has only multiplied. The rot in business schools runs much deeper than almost anyone had guessed, and the blame is unnervingly widespread. In the end, even Schroeder [one of Gino’s co-authors] would become a suspect.

Bonus link: my 2017 refereed paper “Legal Liability for Research Fraud“.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Wikipedia Wednesday: Chesterton’s fence

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Chesterton%27s_fence

Alas, I have no idea how I stumbled upon this particular Wikipedia entry, but Chesterton’s fence is the Smithian idea that reforms should not be made until the reasoning behind the existing state of affairs is understood, and the original quotation is from G. K. Chesterton’s 1929 book The Thing in the chapter “The Drift from Domesticity”:

In the matter of reforming things, as distinct from deforming them, there is one plain and simple principle; a principle which will probably be called a paradox. There exists in such a case a certain institution or law; let us say, for the sake of simplicity, a fence or gate erected across a road. The more modern type of reformer goes gaily up to it and says, “I don’t see the use of this; let us clear it away.” To which the more intelligent type of reformer will do well to answer: “If you don’t see the use of it, I certainly won’t let you clear it away. Go away and think. Then, when you can come back and tell me that you do see the use of it, I may allow you to destroy it.”

As an aside, G. K. Chesterton was a popular English author known as the “prince of paradox”; bonus link below:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Animali mitici d’Italia

r/MapPorn - Mythical Beasts of Italy
Hat tip: u/Few_Simple9049
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment