Tag Archives: Precedent

Was Holmes a Bayesian?

Not that Holmes. This one. In our previous blog post (11/14/14), we promised to explain why our defense of Bayesian methods is relevant to law. After all, how is probability theory generally or any of the foregoing specifically — i.e. Hájek’s analysis … Continue reading

Posted in Bayesian Reasoning, Law, Philosophy | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment