“Ban airplanes. Yes, all of them.”

The venerable New Republic recently published an anti-gun diatribe by Phoebe Maltz Bovy, a young writer living in Toronto. Her essay is provocatively titled “It’s time to ban guns. Yes, all of them.” Not satisfied with just banning guns, we decided to rewrite the opening paragraph of her essay, substituting “airplanes” for guns, “Germanwings Flight 9525” for San Bernardino, and “pilots” for population. Here is our revised paragraph:

Ban airplanes. All airplanes. Get rid of airplanes in airports, and in the air, and, as much as possible, in the air force. Not just because of Germanwings Flight 9525, or whichever air disaster may occur next, but also not not because of those. Don’t sort pilots into those who might do something evil or foolish or self-destructive with an airplane and those who surely will not. As if this could be known—as if it could be assessed without massively violating civil liberties and stigmatizing the mentally ill. Ban airplanes! Not just aviation disasters. Not just certain airplanes. Not just already-technically-illegal drones. All of them.

The logic of our parallel version of Maltz Bovy’s argument  is just as impeccable as hers; our conclusion, however, is just as stupid! (P.S.: This is our 1000th blog post since we started blogging in July 2013.)

About F. E. Guerra-Pujol

When I’m not blogging, I am a business law professor at the University of Central Florida.
This entry was posted in Law, Logical Fallacies. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s