Consider the case of Oscar Lopez Rivera, a Puerto Rican Nationalist who was convicted and sentenced to 70 years in prison for “seditious conspiracy” and has already served more than 32 years of his unjust sentence (more time than Nelson Mandela spent in jail in South Africa). According to Wikipedia, Mr Lopez Rivera rejected an offer of “conditional clemency” by President Clinton in 1999, so who is to blame for Mr Lopez Rivera’s continued incarceration? In any case, why doesn’t President Obama take the moral high ground and offer a full pardon to Mr Lopez Rivera?
When will the U.S. release its remaining political prisoners?
Edward Snowden, state secrets, and double standards
Edward Snowden has been charged by the U.S. Government with stealing and disclosing classified information. But prior probability would ask, didn’t our Government itself unlawfully “steal” the data that Mr Snowden eventually disclosed?
Cartoon courtesy of http://lolzparade.com/politics/edward-snowden-timeline?page=5
Is Facebook the next tech bubble?
Some say yes, but many others say no (*).
(*) i.e., presumably those investors or speculators who have bought Facebook stock since its IPO last year. Graphic courtesy of http://ehow-to-do.com/how-ponzi-schemes-work
Is Bitcoin a scam?
Bitcoin is an open-source, peer-to-peer, electronic currency. In brief, the Bitcoin concept was introduced in 2008 in a paper by “Satoshi Nakamoto,” a mysterious person (or possibly a group of persons) whose true identity is still unknown. Furthermore, according to this Bitcoin exchange, one Bitcoin is now worth about $102 USD (as of 1 August 2013).
So is Bitcoin a scam (or at the very least an overvalued currency)? Again, some say yes; others say no. Here is more. What say you?
What is the probability that a large asteroid will collide with Earth?
According to Wikipedia, asteroids with a 1 km diameter strike Earth every 500,000 years on average. Moreover, “Large collisions–with 5 km (3 mi) objects–happen approximately once every twenty million years. The last known impact of an object of 10 km (6 mi) or more in diameter was at the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event 66 million years ago.” You do the math …
The strategy of escalator conflicts
prior probability asks, should you walk or stand when your are going up (or down) an escalator? The solution to this problem is apparently non-trivial. Here, for example, is one recent BBC report on this question. Here is another take on this question, and here is yet another. Don’t these conflicting behaviors and approaches to escalator travel falsify F.A. Hayek’s famous “spontaneous order” thesis?
I
llustration by Helen Tseng for the Bold Italic website
Hat tip (again) to Tyler Cowen and John B. Chilton
Another reason why taxis are so overpriced …
… because airports like SFO are criminalizing rideshare apps like Lyft, Sidecar and Uber. The title of this report, for example, says it all: “SFO Officials Make Citizen Arrests Of Internet Rideshare Drivers.” According to this report, San Francisco International Airport officials have been citing and arresting drivers from mobile-app enabled rideshare companies that pick up and drop off passenger. This, of course, is total poppycock for passengers. Another reason why licensed taxi drivers, with the backing of local governments, are just legalized thieves.
Robin Hanson asks, “Why do bets look bad?”
prior probability really enjoys Robin Hanson’s blog Overcoming Bias and admire his cutting-edge academic work, especially his project on prediction markets. Recently, Hanson proposed a number of reasons why people might reasonably refuse to place bets to back up their beliefs. Although betting might not be justified in some social situations, why is private betting illegal carte blanche in most places? After all, people are allowed to bet on stocks and other securities, and all decisions are fraught with some level of risk and uncertainty, so why shouldn’t people be free to openly place bets on whatever events or contingencies they want to bet on?
The legal position in the US, or what prior probability likes to call “legal failure” as opposed to “market failure,” does not allow one to run a real prediction market with real money, but now that intrade has shut down, our dream is to one day start up a collaborative and user-friendly prediction market in which people could legally place bets on various propositions, such as the outcome of a legal case, the outcome of an election, or the outcome of a proposed piece of legislation (i.e. the likelihood that a proposed bill will be approved by both houses of Congress).
So what’s stopping us, other than the legal system?
Do incentives matter?

Should exams be open book?
Is an exam just a game played between students and professors, a game in which students try to guess what will be on the exam and professors try to outwit their students? If so, what is the optimal study strategy for students, and likewise, what is the optimal exam design for professors: open or closed book? Here is one of my favorite posts from one of my favorite blogs, cheaptalk.org … Enjoy, and tell me what you think.







