Author Archives: F. E. Guerra-Pujol

Unknown's avatar

About F. E. Guerra-Pujol

When I’m not blogging, I am a business law professor at the University of Central Florida.

NBA “pass probabilities” (San Antonio Spurs edition)

Read Kirk Goldsberry’s excellent report on the growing role of mathematics, statistics, and probability theory in the NBA here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

What’s the probability that Russia will annex additional Ukrainian territory?

We think it is high, very high. After all, Russia has already annexed the whole of the Crimean peninsula without a real fight. Why won’t she annex other pro-Russian regions too, especially the eastern oblasts of Ukraine? Like Adolf Hitler after the 1938 … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Do infants have preferences or utility functions?

This seemingly intractable question is easy enough to answer if you are an academic economist. All you need do is simply assume your answer is yes. But is this any way to search for truth? Doesn’t the economic approach fail … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 6 Comments

Why isn’t the Crimean peninsula worth defending?

She is certainly worth stealing and taking by force, which is what the Russian Federation appears to be doing as we write up this pithy blog post … If you were an advisor to Oleksandr Turchynov, the new (and unelected) prime minister … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

“Something New”

That is the title of this new song in this creative video by Tom Fletcher …

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

A quick critique of Nate Silver’s new website

The new FiveThirtyEight website, which launched last Monday (17 March 2014), purports to offer data journalism in a wide variety of fields, not just politics (the original focus of the original FiveThirtyEight website), but also economics, science, sports, and (our favorite) “life”. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Fair or foul? Bayesian reasoning and Flight 370

Note: this post was revised and expanded during the morning of 20 March 2014. What happened to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370? Specifically, do you have any “priors” about what may have happened, e.g. sabotage, terrorism, pilot error, mechanical failure, an electrical … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Stephen Hawking wins theoretical physics bet …

Or has he?  Prof. Hawking had bet Neil Turok, the director of the Perimeter Institute in Canada, that gravitational waves from the cosmic big bang would eventually be detected.  But according to this report in The Guardian, Dr. Turok refuses to pay up … for now. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Shadow prediction markets?

In our previous post (see Fate of Flight 370 … below), we quixotically called for the creation of a single-event prediction market in order to (1) bypass all the rampant speculation regarding the ill-fated Malaysia Airlines flight, which has been missing since 8 … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The fate of Flight 370? An urgent call for single-event prediction markets …

A single-event prediction market might make it easier to determine more rigorously the probabilities of what really happened to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Presently, a wide variety of conjectures and conspiracy theories are swirling around (especially on CNN) about what might … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments