Category Archives: Philosophy

“Google’s Philosopher”

That is the title of this intriguing essay by Robert Herritt in the Pacific Standard — our favorite e-mag, by the way — summarizing the “philosophy of information” as well as the original work of Luciano Floridi, an Oxford philosopher who is inventing “entirely new ways … Continue reading

Posted in Ethics, Law, Philosophy, Property Rights, Questions Rarely Asked | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is science a pyramid or a circle?

These images appear in Scott Alexander’s blog post “The control group is out of control.” (By the way, props to Cliff for bringing Alexander’s important post to our attention.) Back to Alexander’s post. He writes (the last ellipsis is in the original): … Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy, Science | Leave a comment

“Trolley problems”

That is the title of our latest paper — in which we offer a novel solution to the famous Trolley Problem from moral and legal philosophy — just published in the Drake Law Review Discourse. (You may also click directly on the image … Continue reading

Posted in Economics, Law, Philosophy | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Testing our scientific tests

We recently reviewed the abstract and slides of Deborah Mayo’s 3 Dec. 2014 presentation at Rutgers University. Her excellent talk was titled “Probing with severity: beyond Bayesian probabilism and frequentist performance.” (Both the abstract and the slides of her lecture … Continue reading

Posted in Bayesian Reasoning, Philosophy, Probability, Science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Was Holmes a Bayesian?

Not that Holmes. This one. In our previous blog post (11/14/14), we promised to explain why our defense of Bayesian methods is relevant to law. After all, how is probability theory generally or any of the foregoing specifically — i.e. Hájek’s analysis … Continue reading

Posted in Bayesian Reasoning, Law, Philosophy | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Wikipedia Paradox

According to Wikipedia (citations omitted): “Ignore All Rules” is a “favorite” rule of the English-language open content encyclopedia, Wikipedia. Its formulation is generally (emphasis in original), “If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it.” Wikipedia has … Continue reading

Posted in Paradoxes, Philosophy | Tagged | Leave a comment

Ideological Turing Tests

Now that the midterm elections in the U.S. — as well as the presidential contest in Brasil — are finally over, can you pass an Ideological Turing Test? For example, let’s say you support gay marriage or oppose legalizing the sale of marijuana. Could you … Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy, Politics | Tagged | 2 Comments

“Grow the brain before the beard”

The Tunisian protestor in this picture is holding a sign that reads “Grow the beard before the brain.” This is the best critique of ethical fundamentalism that we have seen in a long time. Hat tip to Strum-Me for the pointer.

Posted in Bayesian Reasoning, Ethics, Philosophy | Leave a comment

Adjudication and the Turing Test

Legal trials resemble the Turing Test in many ways. First, let’s restate the original version of the Turing Test and then compare this test to the process of adjudication.

Posted in Bayesian Reasoning, Games, Law, Philosophy, Probability | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The “Paradox of the Gatecrasher” is not a paradox

There is a sizable scholarly literature discussing the so-called “Paradox of the Gatecrasher,” a simple thought experiment introduced many years ago by British philosopher L. Jonathan Cohen, an evidence problem designed to test the proper role of statistics in law. (For a … Continue reading

Posted in Bayesian Reasoning, Law, Philosophy | Tagged | 4 Comments